A recent report from Wood Mackenzie (WoodMac) highlights significant financial and environmental risks linked to a potential Donald Trump presidential win on November 5. The analysis predicts a possible $1 trillion shortfall in low-carbon energy investments if Trump reclaims the White House.

Impact on Investment and Emissions

According to WoodMac, under the leadership of Trump, U.S. carbon emissions could surge by 1 billion tonnes by 2050 compared to current projections under existing policies. This would severely jeopardize the nation’s ability to meet its decarbonization targets. The energy sector, anticipating stable policy support for clean technology under current guidelines, could see dramatic shifts in investment priorities.

Current vs. Potential Future Policies

President Joe Biden’s administration has strongly supported initiatives aimed at combating climate change. This includes significant tax credits for electric vehicles and stringent emissions standards for automotive and power sectors. In stark contrast, Trump has proposed the rollback of these measures and hinted at a second withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement.

Wood Mackenzie forecasts approximately $7.7 trillion in total energy investments from 2023 to 2050 based on continuation of current policies. These investments are backed by recent laws like the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the Inflation Reduction Act, both of which bolster low-carbon technologies and infrastructure enhancements. However, with a shift in administration to Trump, this investment could decrease by about $1 trillion due to policy reversals.

Long-term Environmental Consequences

The long-term outlook under a Trump presidency could alter significantly. Projected increases in CO2 emissions would make it nearly impossible to achieve the ‘net zero’ goals. Additionally, the electric vehicle market could shrink by 50%, as automakers might pivot towards more hybrid models instead of fully electric ones, in response to changed regulatory environments.

The energy sector’s response to these potential policy changes is underscored by the actions of oil executives, who appear to support Trump in anticipation of favorable energy policies. This election cycle is pivotal, not just for the immediate future, but for setting the trajectory towards 2050, affecting how quickly and effectively the U.S. can transition to a low-carbon economy.

Wood Mackenzie’s David Brown emphasized the critical nature of this election for energy investment, stating, “This election cycle will really influence the pace of energy investment, both in the next five years and through 2050.” The choices made now could determine the feasibility of future decarbonization efforts, making the stakes for this presidential election remarkably high for environmental and economic policies.

Image Source: Politico