Clean energy including solar and wind have become much more affordable over the last several years. Statista reports the cost of solar alone has dropped by over 80% since 2010. This is great news, but doesn’t mean that clean energy tech is both affordable and practical for everyone.
There are several options that can address these concerns with one such solution the topic of an article by euronews.green. Could purchasing a portion of a solar or wind farm be the way for you to save money and reduce your carbon footprint? Learn more in this article shared by CER.
Whether you’re conscious about your carbon emissions or just want to reduce your energy bills, moving away from traditional gas and oil is an increasingly attractive prospect.
Unless you can afford to install a solar panel, choosing an energy supplier with an environmental pledge appears to be the only option for greener energy.
That was until Sarah Merrick from Ripple Energy started helping people to co-own a wind turbine or solar park.
“I could see that wind had become the UK’s cheapest source of electricity but there wasn’t really any way for anyone to get involved,” she tells Euronews Green.
“Big projects are cheaper than small projects so that’s why buying a little bit of a wind farm is over two thirds cheaper than buying the equivalent rooftop solar scheme.”
Is it expensive to co-own a wind turbine or solar park?
First of all you need to decide how much of your electricity bill you want to be covered by renewable energy.
To cover the entire electrical consumption of the average three-bedroom home in the UK, it costs around £1,700 (€1,937) through wind power or £2,612 (€2,984) through solar. However you can choose to buy just a percentage of your usage with shares of a wind farm or solar park starting from £25 (€28).
This is a one-off payment, which can be spread over 12 months, and you’ll own your share for the entirety of the turbine’s 25 year or the solar park’s 40 year life span.
Each time Ripple opens a new project, people opt in with their chosen investment until it is fully funded. With all the co-owners secured, Ripple then builds the turbine or solar park and after a short wait, the members are able to start using their green energy to save money on their monthly bills.
Ripple are building renewable energy parks across the UK
Ripple’s first project was one single wind turbine in Wales. Though it might not sound like much, one rotation of the turbine’s blades creates enough energy to power a home for eight hours, and 900 people were able to sign up to co-ownership.
Their second project, based in Scotland, is fully funded and under construction. This time it’s a much bigger project with eight turbines, 5,600 co-owners and 19 business members.
The latest project, which is still open for investment, is Ripple’s first solar park. The buy-in cost is slightly higher than that of the wind farms but you’ll be benefitting from the energy discounts for 40 years rather than 25.
Though the first two projects were in Wales and Scotland, you don’t need to live nearby to become a member and benefit from its clean energy.
Plus, because unlike a solar panel, you’re not attaching anything to your home, it doesn’t matter if you’re a renter or want to move house. Your green energy can move with you, just like a normal energy supplier.
Is co-owned green energy really cheaper than fossil fuels?
Those who opt into Ripple’s schemes do not get free energy, but instead receive credit on their account each month, when supplied by one of Ripple’s partner energy suppliers.
Ripple estimates your bill will be around 23 per cent cheaper overall. And with traditional energy costs increasing exponentially, this saving is becoming even greater.
“In terms of getting your initial investment back through your savings, it completely depends on the electricity price,” Sarah explains.
“When we launched our first wind farm, we were expecting it to take 13 or 14 years [to get your investment back] but since we launched the prices have gone so high [that] it’s actually looking like the costs could be paid back through savings in maybe four years instead.”
Check out the original article from Hannah Brown at euronews.green.